BVM Management Ltd v Yeomans (t/a the Great Hall At Mains) & Anor
The judge was entitled, on the evidence, to find that the three month termination provision was incorporated into the oral contract concluded on 4 July 2007. There is no legal inconsistency in a two year contract with a three month termination clause. The appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: BVM Management Limited; 1st Respondent: Roger Yeomans t/a The Great Hall at Mains; 2nd Respondent: Adele Yeomans
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court (liability Only)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Oral Contracts, Contractual Terms, Termination Clauses, Damages for Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BVM Management Limited
Appellant
Roger Yeomans t/a The Great Hall at Mains
1st Respondent
Adele Yeomans
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court (liability Only)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a three month termination notice provision was incorporated into the oral contract concluded on 4 July 2007
- 2 Whether the contract was for a fixed term of two years without early termination
- 3 Quantum of damages following termination
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled, on the evidence, to find that the three month termination provision was incorporated into the oral contract concluded on 4 July 2007. There is no legal inconsistency in a two year contract with a three month termination clause. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; damages to be assessed limited to the three month notice period
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment