Post Office & Anor v British World Airlines Ltd [2000] EWHC 204 (Comm) (11 January 2000)
BWA is liable under the contract to the Post Office for compensation paid to customers for lost mail, but only for sums paid as compensation and not for sums paid in lieu of insurance that should have been obtained. The contractual reference to Post Office schemes acts as a ceiling for compensation, not as a restriction to mail carried under schemes. The Warsaw Convention limitation does not further restrict liability between the parties. No alternative claim lies under the statutory regime where the contract governs liability.
- Citation
- [2000] EWHC 204 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Post Office; Defendant: BWA; Claimant Customer: Motorola; Claimant Customer: Burberrys; Claimant Customer: Wemyss Weavecraft; Claimant Customer: BT
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / Trial of Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Claim partially allowed
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Liability, Carriage by Air, Compensation for Loss of Goods, Interpretation of Contracts, Statutory Immunity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Post Office
Claimant
BWA
Defendant
Motorola
Claimant Customer
Burberrys
Claimant Customer
Wemyss Weavecraft
Claimant Customer
BT
Claimant Customer
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Trial of Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether BWA is liable under contract to Post Office for compensation paid to customers for lost mail
- 2 Whether BWA's liability is limited by Post Office schemes or by the Warsaw Convention
- 3 Whether Post Office can recover sums paid in lieu of insurance not obtained
Ratio Decidendi
BWA is liable under the contract to the Post Office for compensation paid to customers for lost mail, but only for sums paid as compensation and not for sums paid in lieu of insurance that should have been obtained. The contractual reference to Post Office schemes acts as a ceiling for compensation, not as a restriction to mail carried under schemes. The Warsaw Convention limitation does not further restrict liability between the parties. No alternative claim lies under the statutory regime where the contract governs liability.
Court Disposition
Claim partially allowed
Orders
- Post Office not entitled to recover sums paid to Motorola, Burberrys, or Wemyss Weavecraft as these were paid in lieu of insurance.
- Post Office may be entitled to recover sums paid to BT, subject to further factual clarification and per item limit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment