C C v R C [2007] EWHC 2033 (Fam) (12 July 2007)
The husband's substantial pre-marital wealth justifies a departure from equal division of assets. The sharing principle applies, but the court must take into account the husband's established wealth prior to the marriage and relationship. The division should not be strictly equal, but reflect the significant resources the husband brought into the marriage.
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 2033 (Fam)
- Parties
- Applicant: C C; Respondent: R C
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Ancillary Relief (financial Remedy) Following Divorce / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Ancillary relief granted with departure from equality justified by husband's pre-marital wealth.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Division of Matrimonial Assets, Pre Marital Wealth, Sharing Principle, Needs Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C C
Applicant
R C
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief (financial Remedy) Following Divorce / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pre-marital wealth justifies departure from equal sharing of assets
- 2 Whether pre-marital cohabitation should be treated as part of the marriage for asset division
- 3 Application of the sharing principle to all property or only matrimonial property
Ratio Decidendi
The husband's substantial pre-marital wealth justifies a departure from equal division of assets. The sharing principle applies, but the court must take into account the husband's established wealth prior to the marriage and relationship. The division should not be strictly equal, but reflect the significant resources the husband brought into the marriage.
Court Disposition
Ancillary relief granted with departure from equality justified by husband's pre-marital wealth.
Orders
- Division of assets to reflect substantial pre-marital wealth of husband; not an equal split.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment