CF v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor.
The First-tier Tribunal breached mandatory procedural rules and natural justice by disposing of the appeal without an oral hearing and without consent from all parties, constituting a material error of law.
- Parties
- Appellant: C. F.; 1st Respondent: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; 2nd Respondent: D. F.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Upper Tribunal Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; First-tier Tribunal decision set aside; case remitted for re-hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Child Maintenance, Procedural Fairness, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C. F.
Appellant
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
1st Respondent
D. F.
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Upper Tribunal Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First-tier Tribunal erred in law by deciding the appeal without an oral hearing contrary to rule 27(1)(a) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Social Entitlement Chamber) Rules 2008
- 2 Whether redactions to documentary evidence were properly made under rule 14(2) or rule 19
Ratio Decidendi
The First-tier Tribunal breached mandatory procedural rules and natural justice by disposing of the appeal without an oral hearing and without consent from all parties, constituting a material error of law.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; First-tier Tribunal decision set aside; case remitted for re-hearing.
Orders
- Case remitted to a different First-tier Tribunal for reconsideration at an oral hearing.
- District Tribunal Judge to consider appropriate case management directions regarding redactions under rule 14(2).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment