C v C
Privilege attaches to the relevant parts of the conveyancing file as the communications occurred in a relevant legal context for the purpose of legal advice. The wife failed to provide sufficiently clear, definite, and compelling evidence of fraud or conduct caught by section 37 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 to...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Petitioner: C; Respondent: C; Respondent: Liechtenstein anstalt; Respondent: Messrs X
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Ancillary Relief Proceedings / Interlocutory Application Regarding Legal Professional Privilege
- Outcome
- Application to set aside privilege dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Legal Professional Privilege, Fraud Exception, Disclosure of Documents, Ancillary Relief, Freezing Injunction
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C
Petitioner
C
Respondent
Liechtenstein anstalt
Respondent
Messrs X
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief Proceedings / Interlocutory Application Regarding Legal Professional Privilege
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether legal professional privilege attaches to communications between the anstalt and its solicitors in a conveyancing transaction
- 2 Whether the privilege can be set aside under the 'fraud' exception
Ratio Decidendi
Privilege attaches to the relevant parts of the conveyancing file as the communications occurred in a relevant legal context for the purpose of legal advice. The wife failed to provide sufficiently clear, definite, and compelling evidence of fraud or conduct caught by section 37 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 to justify setting aside privilege under the fraud exception.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside privilege dismissed
Orders
- The anstalt's claim to privilege over the relevant parts of Messrs X's conveyancing file is upheld.
- The wife's application to go behind privilege on the ground of fraud is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment