CS & Anor, R v [2001] EWCA Crim 339 (15 February 2001)
The convictions are unsafe because the complainant's medical notes, which were not disclosed at trial, provide further inconsistency in her evidence and could have led the jury to acquit the appellants.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Crim 339
- Parties
- Appellant: C. S.; Appellant: O. S.; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Reference by Criminal Cases Review Commission Under S.9 Criminal Appeal Act 1995
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; convictions quashed
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Sexual Offences, Disclosure of Evidence, Unsafe Conviction, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C. S.
Appellant
O. S.
Appellant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Reference by Criminal Cases Review Commission Under S.9 Criminal Appeal Act 1995
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the convictions are unsafe due to non-disclosure of complainant's medical reports
- 2 Whether new medical evidence undermines complainant's credibility
Ratio Decidendi
The convictions are unsafe because the complainant's medical notes, which were not disclosed at trial, provide further inconsistency in her evidence and could have led the jury to acquit the appellants.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; convictions quashed
Orders
- Convictions of C. S. and O. S. quashed
- Legal aid granted for all reasonable steps taken related to this ground over the relevant period
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment