C v D [2025] EWFC 428 (B) (29 May 2025)

C v D [2025] EWFC 428 (B) (29 May 2025)

The appeal was dismissed because the lower court's decisions were within its discretion, properly reasoned, and consistent with the welfare of the child; there was no procedural irregularity or error of law in dismissing the late application, refusing adjournment, or ordering attendance at the father's chosen school.

Citation
[2025] EWFC 428 (B)
Parties
Appellant: C; Respondent: D
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 May 2025
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Child Arrangements Order, Specific Issue Order, Appeal Procedure, Welfare of the Child, Case Management, Education Disputes
Family Law Child Arrangements Order Specific Issue Order Appeal Procedure Welfare of the Child Case Management Education Disputes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

C

Appellant

D

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Law Appeal / Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the dismissal of the mother's Child Arrangements Order application was procedurally or substantively wrong
  2. 2 Whether the refusal to adjourn the Decision Hearing was procedurally or substantively wrong
  3. 3 Whether the decision to order the child to attend the father's chosen school was wrong in law or discretion

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the lower court's decisions were within its discretion, properly reasoned, and consistent with the welfare of the child; there was no procedural irregularity or error of law in dismissing the late application, refusing adjournment, or ordering attendance at the father's chosen school.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; lower court orders affirmed