C v D

C v D

The appeal was dismissed because the lower court's decisions were within its discretion, properly considered the welfare checklist, and there was no procedural irregularity or error of law in dismissing the mother's application, refusing adjournment, or ordering the child to attend the father's chosen school.

Parties
Appellant: C; Respondent: D
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 May 2025
Procedural Posture
Family / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Child Arrangements Order, Specific Issue Order, Appeal, Welfare of the Child, Case Management, Pathfinder Model
Family Law Child Arrangements Order Specific Issue Order Appeal Welfare of the Child Case Management Pathfinder Model

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

C

Appellant

D

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family / Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the summary dismissal of the mother's Child Arrangements Order application was procedurally irregular or unjust
  2. 2 Whether the refusal to adjourn the Decision Hearing was procedurally irregular or unjust
  3. 3 Whether the decision to order the child to attend the father's chosen school was wrong in law or discretion

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the lower court's decisions were within its discretion, properly considered the welfare checklist, and there was no procedural irregularity or error of law in dismissing the mother's application, refusing adjournment, or ordering the child to attend the father's chosen school.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed