C v D (No 2) (2007 Hague Convention) [2024] EWFC 36 (27 February 2024)
The appeal was dismissed because none of the grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement under the 2007 Hague Convention were established: the US court had jurisdiction, the father had notice and opportunity to be heard, there was no procedural fraud, and no incompatibility with English orders.
- Citation
- [2024] EWFC 36
- Parties
- Appellant: C; Respondent: D
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / Appeal Rehearing Following Remittal by Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Child Maintenance, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Orders, Jurisdiction, Due Process, Fraud Allegations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C
Appellant
D
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Appeal Rehearing Following Remittal by Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether registration of a US child support order should be refused under the 2007 Hague Convention grounds, including lack of jurisdiction, lack of notice, fraud, incompatibility with English orders, and due process.
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because none of the grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement under the 2007 Hague Convention were established: the US court had jurisdiction, the father had notice and opportunity to be heard, there was no procedural fraud, and no incompatibility with English orders.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Registration of the US child support order stands
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment