R v C (Rev 1) [2019] EWCA Crim 623 (09 April 2019)
Section 116(5) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 does not render hearsay evidence inadmissible where the deceased witness's death was not caused by the party seeking to adduce the evidence to prevent testimony. The trial judge's careful application of the statutory framework and provision of appropriate jury...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] EWCA Crim 623
- Parties
- Respondent: R; Appellant: C
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Crown Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Hearsay Evidence, Jury Discharge, Sexual Offences, Admissibility of Evidence, Bad Character Evidence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Respondent
C
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Crown Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the admission of hearsay evidence (ABE interview and suicide note) was proper under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and PACE 1984
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to discharge the jury after a prejudicial jury note
Ratio Decidendi
Section 116(5) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 does not render hearsay evidence inadmissible where the deceased witness's death was not caused by the party seeking to adduce the evidence to prevent testimony. The trial judge's careful application of the statutory framework and provision of appropriate jury directions meant there was no unfairness or miscarriage of justice in admitting the evidence or refusing to discharge the jury.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment