C, R. v
The admissibility of the DNA evidence was properly determined by the trial judge based on reliability, not quantity; the judge correctly accepted the prosecution expert's evidence that the profile was reliable despite being below the stochastic threshold. The order for a preparatory hearing was wrongly made as the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: C
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Ruling on Admissibility of DNA Evidence/preparatory Hearing Order
- Outcome
- Order for preparatory hearing quashed; trial to proceed with DNA evidence admissible.
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of DNA Evidence, Preparatory Hearings, Expert Evidence, Case Management
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
C
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Ruling on Admissibility of DNA Evidence/preparatory Hearing Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the DNA evidence was admissible under s.78 of PACE
- 2 Whether the judge should have ordered a preparatory hearing under s.29 of CPIA
- 3 Proper approach to admissibility of DNA evidence and case management
Ratio Decidendi
The admissibility of the DNA evidence was properly determined by the trial judge based on reliability, not quantity; the judge correctly accepted the prosecution expert's evidence that the profile was reliable despite being below the stochastic threshold. The order for a preparatory hearing was wrongly made as the case did not meet the statutory criteria, and such an order cannot be made ex post facto after the ruling.
Court Disposition
Order for preparatory hearing quashed; trial to proceed with DNA evidence admissible.
Orders
- Order for preparatory hearing under s.29 CPIA set aside
- DNA evidence ruled admissible; trial to proceed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment