C, R. v
The notional minimum term of four years set by the sentencing judge was manifestly excessive given the appellant's age, early guilty plea, absence of violence, attempted (not completed) offence, and cooperation. The appropriate determinate sentence is three years less time spent on remand. The appellant qualifies as dangerous, but the statutory threshold for detention for public protection or extended sentence is not met.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: C
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Attempted Rape, Dangerousness, Detention for Public Protection, Extended Sentence, Youth Offender
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
C
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant qualifies as dangerous under section 229 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 as amended by the 2008 Act
- 2 Whether the sentence of detention for public protection was appropriate
- 3 What is the appropriate determinate sentence for attempted rape by a youth offender
Ratio Decidendi
The notional minimum term of four years set by the sentencing judge was manifestly excessive given the appellant's age, early guilty plea, absence of violence, attempted (not completed) offence, and cooperation. The appropriate determinate sentence is three years less time spent on remand. The appellant qualifies as dangerous, but the statutory threshold for detention for public protection or extended sentence is not met.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sentence of detention for public protection quashed
- Substituted with a determinate sentence of three years detention in a young offender institution under section 91 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment