CAB Housing Ltd v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 194 (23 February 2023)
The Court held that the local planning authority may consider the scale of the proposed development at the prior approval stage under Class AA of Part 1 of Schedule 2 to the GPDO; 'adjoining premises' includes both contiguous and neighbouring properties; and the considerations of 'amenity' and 'external appearance' are not limited to the examples listed in the GPDO but are broader, allowing the authority to exercise planning judgment on a case-by-case basis.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Civ 194
- Parties
- Appellant: CAB Housing Limited; First Respondent: Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities; Second Respondent: Broxbourne Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Review Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Permitted Development Rights, Prior Approval Process, Interpretation of 'adjoining Premises', Amenity and External Appearance, Town and Country Planning (general Permitted Development) (england) Order 2015
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CAB Housing Limited
Appellant
Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
First Respondent
Broxbourne Borough Council
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Statutory Review Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the scale of development under Class AA can be controlled at the prior approval stage
- 2 Interpretation of 'adjoining premises' in paragraph AA.2(3)(a)(i) of the GPDO
- 3 Scope of 'amenity' and 'external appearance' considerations under Class AA
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the local planning authority may consider the scale of the proposed development at the prior approval stage under Class AA of Part 1 of Schedule 2 to the GPDO; 'adjoining premises' includes both contiguous and neighbouring properties; and the considerations of 'amenity' and 'external appearance' are not limited to the examples listed in the GPDO but are broader, allowing the authority to exercise planning judgment on a case-by-case basis.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The order of Holgate J. dismissing the application for statutory review is upheld.
- No prior approval is granted for the proposed development at 31 Gaywood Avenue, Cheshunt.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment