CAB Housing Limited v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities & Anor
The prior approval process under Class AA of Part 1 of Schedule 2 to the GPDO 2015 allows the local planning authority to consider the scale of the proposed development, the impact on the amenity of any adjoining (including neighbouring) premises, and the external appearance of the dwellinghouse, not limited to the principal or side elevations. The terms 'amenity' and 'external appearance' are not confined to the examples listed in the Order. The inspector and judge did not err in law in their interpretation or application of these provisions.
- Parties
- Appellant: CAB Housing Limited; First Respondent: Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities; Second Respondent: Broxbourne Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Review / Planning Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Permitted Development Rights, Statutory Interpretation, Prior Approval Process, Amenity, External Appearance, Town and Country Planning Act, GPDO
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CAB Housing Limited
Appellant
Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
First Respondent
Broxbourne Borough Council
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Statutory Review / Planning Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Interpretation of Class AA of Part 1 of Schedule 2 to the GPDO 2015
- 2 Whether 'scale' of development is subject to prior approval control
- 3 Meaning of 'adjoining premises' in the context of prior approval
Ratio Decidendi
The prior approval process under Class AA of Part 1 of Schedule 2 to the GPDO 2015 allows the local planning authority to consider the scale of the proposed development, the impact on the amenity of any adjoining (including neighbouring) premises, and the external appearance of the dwellinghouse, not limited to the principal or side elevations. The terms 'amenity' and 'external appearance' are not confined to the examples listed in the Order. The inspector and judge did not err in law in their interpretation or application of these provisions.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment