Digicel (St. Lucia) Ltd & Ors v Cable & Wireless Plc & Ors
Privilege in legal advice was not waived by defendants; neither references in witness statements nor pleading of honest belief as to lawfulness constituted deployment of contents of legal advice. English law does not override privilege based on fairness or relevance, and no order for disclosure can be made absent waiver.
- Parties
- Claimant: Digicel (St. Lucia) Limited; Claimant: Digicel (SVG) Limited; Claimant: Digicel Grenada Limited; Claimant: Digicel (Barbados) Limited; Claimant: Digicel (Trinidad & Tobago) Limited; Claimant: Digicel Cayman Limited; Claimant: Digicel (Turks & Caicos) Limited; Claimant: Digicel Limited; Defendant: Cable & Wireless Plc; Defendant: Cable & Wireless (West Indies) Limited; Defendant: Cable & Wireless Grenada Limited; Defendant: Cable & Wireless (Barbados) Limited; Defendant: Cable & Wireless (Cayman Islands) Limited; Defendant: Telecommunications Services of Trinidad & Tobago Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application Ruling
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Legal Professional Privilege, Waiver of Privilege, Disclosure of Documents, State of Mind, Conspiracy to Injure by Unlawful Means
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Digicel (St. Lucia) Limited
Claimant
Digicel (SVG) Limited
Claimant
Digicel Grenada Limited
Claimant
Digicel (Barbados) Limited
Claimant
Digicel (Trinidad & Tobago) Limited
Claimant
Digicel Cayman Limited
Claimant
Digicel (Turks & Caicos) Limited
Claimant
Digicel Limited
Claimant
Cable & Wireless Plc
Defendant
Cable & Wireless (West Indies) Limited
Defendant
Cable & Wireless Grenada Limited
Defendant
Cable & Wireless (Barbados) Limited
Defendant
Cable & Wireless (Cayman Islands) Limited
Defendant
Telecommunications Services of Trinidad & Tobago Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendants waived legal professional privilege in legal advice by pleading honest belief as to lawfulness of conduct
- 2 Whether references in witness statements to legal advice constitute waiver of privilege
- 3 Whether fairness or relevance can override privilege in English law
Ratio Decidendi
Privilege in legal advice was not waived by defendants; neither references in witness statements nor pleading of honest belief as to lawfulness constituted deployment of contents of legal advice. English law does not override privilege based on fairness or relevance, and no order for disclosure can be made absent waiver.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment