Lowe, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1673 (02 December 2025)
The applicant's guilty pleas were properly entered, and there is no merit in the grounds of appeal as the prosecution would have proceeded even if guidance had been applied, and the applicant made a free and informed decision not to vacate his pleas. No basis exists for admitting fresh evidence or granting an anonymity order.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 1673
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Cadonius Lowe
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Modern Slavery, Statutory Defence, Guilty Plea, Anonymity Order, Extension of Time, Fresh Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Cadonius Lowe
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's conviction is unsafe due to failure by the prosecution to apply modern slavery guidance
- 2 Whether the applicant was inadequately advised about the statutory defence under section 45 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015
- 3 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted regarding the applicant's status as a victim of modern slavery
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's guilty pleas were properly entered, and there is no merit in the grounds of appeal as the prosecution would have proceeded even if guidance had been applied, and the applicant made a free and informed decision not to vacate his pleas. No basis exists for admitting fresh evidence or granting an anonymity order.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal conviction refused
- Application for extension of time refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment