R v Cadonius Lowe
The applicant's guilty pleas were properly entered, and there is no merit in the application to appeal or to adduce fresh evidence. The CPS would have prosecuted the case even if its policy had been applied, and the applicant was aware of his right to vacate his pleas but chose not to do so. There is no basis for granting an extension of time, anonymity order, or reporting restrictions.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Cadonius Lowe
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Modern Slavery, Statutory Defence, Extension of Time, Anonymity Order, Reporting Restrictions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Cadonius Lowe
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was a victim of modern slavery entitled to a statutory defence under section 45 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015
- 2 Whether the prosecution failed to apply guidance regarding suspects who may be victims of trafficking or slavery
- 3 Whether the applicant was adequately advised about the statutory defence and his guilty pleas
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's guilty pleas were properly entered, and there is no merit in the application to appeal or to adduce fresh evidence. The CPS would have prosecuted the case even if its policy had been applied, and the applicant was aware of his right to vacate his pleas but chose not to do so. There is no basis for granting an extension of time, anonymity order, or reporting restrictions.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- application for leave to appeal conviction refused
- application to adduce fresh evidence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment