Johnson, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 771 (21 June 2023)
The offence was properly categorised as 3B under the guidelines, with a starting point of 2 years and a range of 1-4 years. Aggravating features justified a sentence at the top of the range, but after full credit for the guilty plea, the sentence should be 32 months' imprisonment. An extended sentence was not available as the custodial term fell below 4 years after credit for plea.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 771
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Callum Curtis Johnson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Robbery, Sentencing Guidelines, Dangerousness, Extended Sentence, Guilty Plea Credit
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Callum Curtis Johnson
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for attempted robbery was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the offence was correctly categorised under sentencing guidelines
- 3 Whether an extended sentence was lawfully imposed
Ratio Decidendi
The offence was properly categorised as 3B under the guidelines, with a starting point of 2 years and a range of 1-4 years. Aggravating features justified a sentence at the top of the range, but after full credit for the guilty plea, the sentence should be 32 months' imprisonment. An extended sentence was not available as the custodial term fell below 4 years after credit for plea.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Sentence of 6 years (4 years custody plus 2 years extended licence) quashed
- Substituted sentence of 32 months' imprisonment imposed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment