Crown Prosecution Service, R (on the application of) v Cambridge Crown Court
The court held that the proper route for the prosecution was to appeal the decision not to make a confiscation order under section 6, rather than seek judicial review, as section 31(2) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 provides for such an appeal and judicial review is excluded where an appeal is available.
- Parties
- Claimant: Crown Prosecution Service; Defendant: Cambridge Crown Court
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Proceedings, Absconding Defendant, Appeal Mechanisms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Crown Prosecution Service
Claimant
Cambridge Crown Court
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Crown Court judge erred in terminating confiscation proceedings under section 6 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 due to the defendant's absence
- 2 Whether judicial review is the appropriate remedy or whether an appeal lies under section 31 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
- 3 Whether the defendant's conduct constituted absconding for the purposes of section 6(8) and section 27 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the proper route for the prosecution was to appeal the decision not to make a confiscation order under section 6, rather than seek judicial review, as section 31(2) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 provides for such an appeal and judicial review is excluded where an appeal is available.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review dismissed
Orders
- Application for judicial review is dismissed as an appeal is the appropriate remedy under section 31(2) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment