S (A Child) , Re
The judge's findings that S suffered significant harm while in the care of her parents, without a positive finding of deliberate infliction, were consistent with the evidence and statutory requirements; the appeal was dismissed as the findings were not plainly wrong and the split hearing was inappropriate for the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Cambridgeshire County Council; Respondent: PS; Respondent: JS; Respondent: S (A Child) (by her Children’s Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Care Orders, Threshold Criteria, Case Management, Split Hearings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cambridgeshire County Council
Appellant
PS
Respondent
JS
Respondent
S (A Child) (by her Children’s Guardian)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the threshold criteria under section 31(2) Children Act 1989 were satisfied
- 2 Whether the injury to S was non-accidental and attributable to parental care
- 3 Whether the judge's findings were inconsistent or insufficiently reasoned
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's findings that S suffered significant harm while in the care of her parents, without a positive finding of deliberate infliction, were consistent with the evidence and statutory requirements; the appeal was dismissed as the findings were not plainly wrong and the split hearing was inappropriate for the case context.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Proceedings remitted to the allocated judge for further hearing to determine any outstanding issues of fact and welfare evaluations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment