Camden Primary Care Trust v Atchoe
Removal from the on-call roster for health and safety reasons, as permitted and required by the implied term of the contract, meant Mr Atchoe was not entitled to on-call payments. There was no unauthorised deduction from wages as the payments were only due when on the roster and available for call-out.
- Parties
- Appellant: Camden Primary Care Trust; Respondent: Atchoe
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (employment) / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unauthorised Deductions From Wages, Implied Terms in Employment Contracts, Health and Safety Obligations, On Call Payments, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Camden Primary Care Trust
Appellant
Atchoe
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (employment) / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether removal from on-call roster and consequent loss of payment constituted unauthorised deduction from wages under Section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- 2 Whether employer was contractually entitled to remove employee from on-call roster on health and safety grounds
- 3 Whether failure to pay on-call payments amounted to breach of contract
Ratio Decidendi
Removal from the on-call roster for health and safety reasons, as permitted and required by the implied term of the contract, meant Mr Atchoe was not entitled to on-call payments. There was no unauthorised deduction from wages as the payments were only due when on the roster and available for call-out.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs assessed at £10,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment