Inter Lotto (UK) Ltd v Camelot Group Plc [2003] EWHC 1256 (Ch) (06 June 2003)
The existence of a registered trade mark does not per se override or extinguish common law rights in passing off. The relevant date for assessing the claimant's reputation and goodwill in a passing off claim is the date the defendant commenced use of the mark, not the date of trade mark application or registration. Registration does not confer a positive entitlement to use the mark in the face of prior rights, and mere infringement does not amount to such wrongdoing as to bar a passing off claim.
- Citation
- [2003] EWHC 1256 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Inter Lotto (UK) Limited; Defendant: Camelot Group Plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Intellectual Property / Judgment on Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Preliminary issue answered in the negative; claimant's passing off claim not limited by date of trade mark application.
- Legal Topics
- Passing Off, Trade Mark Infringement, Goodwill, Trade Mark Registration, Ex Turpi Causa, Priority of Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Inter Lotto (UK) Limited
Claimant
Camelot Group Plc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Intellectual Property / Judgment on Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the date of trade mark application (17 October 2001) is the relevant date for assessing the claimant's reputation and goodwill in a passing off claim.
- 2 Whether registration of a trade mark gives the proprietor an overriding entitlement to use the mark, defeating prior common law rights of passing off.
- 3 Whether use of a mark that infringes a registered trade mark is per se incapable of generating protectable goodwill for passing off.
Ratio Decidendi
The existence of a registered trade mark does not per se override or extinguish common law rights in passing off. The relevant date for assessing the claimant's reputation and goodwill in a passing off claim is the date the defendant commenced use of the mark, not the date of trade mark application or registration. Registration does not confer a positive entitlement to use the mark in the face of prior rights, and mere infringement does not amount to such wrongdoing as to bar a passing off claim.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issue answered in the negative; claimant's passing off claim not limited by date of trade mark application.
Orders
- The relevant date for assessing Inter Lotto's reputation and goodwill is the date Camelot commenced use of the mark, not the date of trade mark application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment