Lambert & Anor v Cardif County Council

Lambert & Anor v Cardif County Council

The fostering agreements were not enforceable as private law contracts but were part of a statutory scheme; no actionable misrepresentation was made by the Council regarding insurance; the Council did not owe a duty to indemnify or insure the claimants against all losses; while there was a breach in failing to disclose one incident of the child's history, this did not cause the claimants' loss; the Council was not liable in tort for the psychiatric injury suffered by the claimants as a result of the child's actions.

Parties
Claimant: Roger William Mervyn Lambert; Claimant: Marjorie Rose Diane Lambert; Defendant: Cardiff County Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 January 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Foster Care Liability, Misrepresentation, Breach of Statutory Duty, Negligence, Duty of Care, Breach of Contract, Indemnity and Insurance Obligations
Tort Contract Administrative Law Foster Care Liability Misrepresentation Breach of Statutory Duty Negligence Duty of Care +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roger William Mervyn Lambert

Claimant

Marjorie Rose Diane Lambert

Claimant

Cardiff County Council

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Council made actionable misrepresentations regarding insurance coverage for foster carers
  2. 2 Whether the fostering agreements were enforceable as private law contracts
  3. 3 Whether the Council owed and breached a duty of care to the claimants in tort, including duties to provide information, control the child, and support the claimants

Ratio Decidendi

The fostering agreements were not enforceable as private law contracts but were part of a statutory scheme; no actionable misrepresentation was made by the Council regarding insurance; the Council did not owe a duty to indemnify or insure the claimants against all losses; while there was a breach in failing to disclose one incident of the child's history, this did not cause the claimants' loss; the Council was not liable in tort for the psychiatric injury suffered by the claimants as a result of the child's actions.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Judgment for the Defendant
  • Costs to be determined or agreed