J, Re (refusal to transfer to HC) [2015] EWFC B162 (16 October 2015)
The case does not require transfer to the High Court as it is a straightforward welfare decision suitable for a District Judge; the mother's immigration and housing status do not preclude her as a carer due to the likely application of the Zambrano principle and relevant case law; transfer would cause unnecessary delay.
- Citation
- [2015] EWFC B162
- Parties
- Child: J; Mother: M; Father: F; Local Authority: LBBD
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Application to Transfer to High Court Refused
- Outcome
- application for transfer to High Court refused
- Legal Topics
- Care Proceedings, Child Welfare, Immigration Status of Carers, Housing Rights, Judicial Review, Transfer of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J
Child
M
Mother
F
Father
LBBD
Local Authority
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Application to Transfer to High Court Refused
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether care proceedings should be transferred to the High Court
- 2 Impact of mother's immigration and housing status on her suitability as carer
- 3 Application of Zambrano principle to right to remain and housing
Ratio Decidendi
The case does not require transfer to the High Court as it is a straightforward welfare decision suitable for a District Judge; the mother's immigration and housing status do not preclude her as a carer due to the likely application of the Zambrano principle and relevant case law; transfer would cause unnecessary delay.
Court Disposition
application for transfer to High Court refused
Orders
- Final hearing to proceed in family court as scheduled
- No transfer of proceedings to High Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment