Cullen, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 412 (21 February 2025)
The sentencing judge correctly categorised the offence as a category 1A assault, properly considered aggravating and mitigating factors, and was justified in not requiring a pre-sentence report. The sentence imposed was fair and proportionate. There was no merit in any ground of appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 412
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Carl Cullen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Grievous Bodily Harm With Intent, Criminal Damage, Sentencing Guidelines, Domestic Abuse, Dangerousness Assessment, Pre Sentence Report
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Carl Cullen
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge failed to properly apply the sentencing guidelines for grievous bodily harm with intent
- 2 Whether sufficient mitigation was considered
- 3 Whether the absence of a pre-sentence report rendered the sentence unsafe
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge correctly categorised the offence as a category 1A assault, properly considered aggravating and mitigating factors, and was justified in not requiring a pre-sentence report. The sentence imposed was fair and proportionate. There was no merit in any ground of appeal.
Court Disposition
renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment