MacDowall, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 294 (07 March 2024)
Given the gravity and circumstances of the offences, the judge was entitled to conclude that a pre-sentence report was unnecessary and to impose an extended sentence for public protection; the appeal report confirmed the appellant's dangerousness, rendering the extended sentence unimpeachable.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 294
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Carl MacDowall
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Dangerousness Assessment, Extended Sentence, Pre Sentence Report, Firearms Offences, Kidnapping, Wounding With Intent, Drug Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Carl MacDowall
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in imposing an extended sentence without obtaining a pre-sentence report
- 2 Whether the extended licence period was justified under the Sentencing Act 2020
Ratio Decidendi
Given the gravity and circumstances of the offences, the judge was entitled to conclude that a pre-sentence report was unnecessary and to impose an extended sentence for public protection; the appeal report confirmed the appellant's dangerousness, rendering the extended sentence unimpeachable.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against sentence dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment