Judi Barbara Bonham & Anor v Carole Stringer & Ors
The word 'four' in clause 7 was inserted in error and should be read as 'three', as the testator intended to benefit three groups and not to create a partial intestacy. The construction of the will, considering its context and evidence, supports dividing the Trust Fund into three equal parts.
- Parties
- Claimant: Judi Barbara Bonham; Claimant: Catherine Joanna Green; Defendant: Carole Stringer; Defendant: John Stringer; Defendant: Lisa Ellis; Defendant: Sally Wathen; Defendant: Margaret Webb; Defendant: Mark Seabrook; Defendant: Amanda Jane Seabrook
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Claim for Construction or Rectification of Will / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaration granted as to true construction of clause 7; rectification not required.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Wills, Rectification of Wills, Partial Intestacy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Judi Barbara Bonham
Claimant
Catherine Joanna Green
Claimant
Carole Stringer
Defendant
John Stringer
Defendant
Lisa Ellis
Defendant
Sally Wathen
Defendant
Margaret Webb
Defendant
Mark Seabrook
Defendant
Amanda Jane Seabrook
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Claim for Construction or Rectification of Will / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 7 of the will should be construed to divide the Trust Fund into three or four parts
- 2 Whether the will should be rectified to replace 'four' with 'three' in clause 7
Ratio Decidendi
The word 'four' in clause 7 was inserted in error and should be read as 'three', as the testator intended to benefit three groups and not to create a partial intestacy. The construction of the will, considering its context and evidence, supports dividing the Trust Fund into three equal parts.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted as to true construction of clause 7; rectification not required.
Orders
- Declaration that clause 7 of the will of 22 November 2017 is to be construed as dividing the Trust Fund into three parts, each held on the trusts set out in sub-paragraphs (i), (ii), and (iii) of clause 7(a).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment