Gibbs v Lakeside Developments Ltd
A tenant cannot recover proceeds of sale of property on the basis of unjust enrichment without first setting aside the possession order, even if third party rights have intervened. The order remains binding and effective until set aside, and the correct procedure is to seek to set aside the order before pursuing restitutionary claims.
- Parties
- Appellant: Carolyn Gibbs; Respondent: Lakeside Developments Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From County Court at Central London
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Forfeiture of Lease, Relief Against Forfeiture, Unjust Enrichment, Possession Orders, Service of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Carolyn Gibbs
Appellant
Lakeside Developments Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From County Court at Central London
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a tenant can recover proceeds of sale of property on the basis of unjust enrichment without first setting aside a possession order made without proper service
- 2 Whether an exception exists to the general rule where third party rights have intervened preventing the setting aside of the order
Ratio Decidendi
A tenant cannot recover proceeds of sale of property on the basis of unjust enrichment without first setting aside the possession order, even if third party rights have intervened. The order remains binding and effective until set aside, and the correct procedure is to seek to set aside the order before pursuing restitutionary claims.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; no relief granted to appellant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment