Citicorp International Ltd v Castex Technologies Ltd [2016] EWHC 349 (Comm) (24 February 2016)
Condition 8.11 applies only to Redemption Notices and not to Mandatory Conversion Notices under Condition 8.2. The Mandatory Conversion Notice did not need to include the contents of Condition 8.11 and was valid as served.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 349 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Citicorp International Limited; Defendant: Castex Technologies Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim (summary Judgment Application and Preliminary Issue) / Determination of Preliminary Issue on Validity of Mandatory Conversion Notice
- Outcome
- Preliminary issue resolved in favour of the Defendant; the Mandatory Conversion Notice was valid.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Contractual Terms, Convertible Bonds, Mandatory Conversion Notice, Summary Judgment, Preliminary Issue Determination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Citicorp International Limited
Claimant
Castex Technologies Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim (summary Judgment Application and Preliminary Issue) / Determination of Preliminary Issue on Validity of Mandatory Conversion Notice
Legal Issues
- 1 Does Condition 8.11 of the Terms and Conditions governing the Bonds apply to a Mandatory Conversion Notice under Condition 8.2?
- 2 Was the Mandatory Conversion Notice served by the Defendant invalid for failing to include information allegedly required by Condition 8.11?
Ratio Decidendi
Condition 8.11 applies only to Redemption Notices and not to Mandatory Conversion Notices under Condition 8.2. The Mandatory Conversion Notice did not need to include the contents of Condition 8.11 and was valid as served.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issue resolved in favour of the Defendant; the Mandatory Conversion Notice was valid.
Orders
- The Defendant's construction of Condition 8.11 is correct.
- The Notice did not need to include the contents of Condition 8.11.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment