Castle Holdco 4 Ltd, Re
The court has jurisdiction to convene meetings for a Cayman company due to its substantial connection with England and Wales. Two meetings for Floating Rate Note holders and Senior Note holders are appropriate, as differences in note terms do not materially affect their legal rights under the Scheme. Notices and...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Castle Holdco 4 Limited; Subsidiary: Countrywide Plc; Subsidiary: Balanus Limited; Subsidiary: Securemove Property Services 2005 Limited; Subsidiary: Countrywide Estate Agents (Unlimited Company); Subsidiary: Countrywide Estate Agents FS Limited; Subsidiary: Countrywide Surveyors Limited; Subsidiary: Countrywide Property Lawyers Limited; Subsidiary: Slater Hogg Mortgages Limited; Subsidiary: Countrywide Franchising Limited; Subsidiary: Countrywide Estate Agents (South) Limited; Nominee: BT Globenet Nominees Limited; Common Depository: Deutschebank AG (London branch); Interested Investors' Advocate: Jones Day
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Scheme of Arrangement / Application for Convening Creditors' Meetings
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Scheme of Arrangement, Creditors' Meetings, Jurisdiction Over Foreign Companies, Debt Restructuring
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Castle Holdco 4 Limited
Applicant
Countrywide Plc
Subsidiary
Balanus Limited
Subsidiary
Securemove Property Services 2005 Limited
Subsidiary
Countrywide Estate Agents (Unlimited Company)
Subsidiary
Countrywide Estate Agents FS Limited
Subsidiary
Countrywide Surveyors Limited
Subsidiary
Countrywide Property Lawyers Limited
Subsidiary
Slater Hogg Mortgages Limited
Subsidiary
Countrywide Franchising Limited
Subsidiary
Countrywide Estate Agents (South) Limited
Subsidiary
BT Globenet Nominees Limited
Nominee
Deutschebank AG (London branch)
Common Depository
Jones Day
Interested Investors' Advocate
Procedural Posture
Scheme of Arrangement / Application for Convening Creditors' Meetings
Legal Issues
- 1 Jurisdiction to convene meetings for a Cayman company under English law
- 2 Appropriate constitution and composition of creditor meetings
- 3 Treatment of beneficial owners and contingent creditors
Ratio Decidendi
The court has jurisdiction to convene meetings for a Cayman company due to its substantial connection with England and Wales. Two meetings for Floating Rate Note holders and Senior Note holders are appropriate, as differences in note terms do not materially affect their legal rights under the Scheme. Notices and voting arrangements for ultimate beneficial owners are sufficient, and London is an appropriate venue.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Meetings of Floating Rate Note Scheme Creditors and Senior Note Scheme Creditors to be convened in London as per draft Order
- Notice to be directed to ultimate beneficial owners
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment