SEM v The Mid Yorkshire Hospitals Trust [2006] EWCA Civ 643 (27 April 2006)
The judge found that, even with proper advice, the claimant would have opted for the surgery performed, and her psychiatric condition meant conservative treatment was unlikely to succeed. No error of law or fact was demonstrated.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 643
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: SEM; Defendant/respondent: The Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Clinical Negligence Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Causation, Psychiatric Evidence, Informed Consent, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SEM
Claimant/appellant
The Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Clinical Negligence Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the failure to provide pre-operative advice caused the claimant's injury
- 2 Whether psychiatric evidence was properly considered
- 3 Whether inaccuracies in medical records affected the outcome
Ratio Decidendi
The judge found that, even with proper advice, the claimant would have opted for the surgery performed, and her psychiatric condition meant conservative treatment was unlikely to succeed. No error of law or fact was demonstrated.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- permission to appeal denied
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment