Hardisty v Aubrey
The trial judge's finding of cessation was logically inconsistent with his acceptance of the claimant's credibility and contemporaneous evidence. The late emergence of the cessation issue and failure to put it properly to the claimant rendered the trial unfair. The appeal is allowed, and the case is remitted for rehearing limited to acceleration and quantification, with causation determined in the claimant's favour.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Tania Louise Hardisty; Defendant/respondent: Anne Aubrey
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Causation, Damages, Whiplash Injury, Acceleration of Symptoms, Fair Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tania Louise Hardisty
Claimant/appellant
Anne Aubrey
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in finding a cessation of symptoms and thus a break in causation between the accident and ongoing symptoms
- 2 Whether the trial was unfair due to the late emergence of the cessation issue
- 3 Whether the case should be remitted for a full rehearing or limited to specific issues
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's finding of cessation was logically inconsistent with his acceptance of the claimant's credibility and contemporaneous evidence. The late emergence of the cessation issue and failure to put it properly to the claimant rendered the trial unfair. The appeal is allowed, and the case is remitted for rehearing limited to acceleration and quantification, with causation determined in the claimant's favour.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Action remitted to Cardiff County Court for rehearing limited to issues of acceleration and re-quantification of the claim
- Rehearing not to be listed before Mr Recorder David Phillips QC
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment