Misa Zgonec-Rozej & Ors v Dr Stephen Pereira

Misa Zgonec-Rozej & Ors v Dr Stephen Pereira

The appeal was dismissed because the judge's findings on causation were properly founded on the evidence. There was no evidence that the breaches of duty by Dr Pereira caused or materially contributed to Mr Jones' death. The doctrine of material contribution did not apply as the 'but for' test could be determined. The judge's findings regarding handover, care planning, and contributory negligence were not plainly wrong or illogical.

Parties
Appellant/claimant: Ms Misa Zgonec-Rozej; Appellant/claimant: Patrick Zgonec Jones; Appellant/claimant: Zachary Zgonec-Rozej; Respondent/defendant: Dr Stephen Pereira
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 February 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Causation, Breach of Duty, Material Contribution, Contributory Negligence, Psychiatric Care, Fatal Accidents
Medical Negligence Tort Law Causation Breach of Duty Material Contribution Contributory Negligence Psychiatric Care Fatal Accidents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ms Misa Zgonec-Rozej

Appellant/claimant

Patrick Zgonec Jones

Appellant/claimant

Zachary Zgonec-Rozej

Appellant/claimant

Dr Stephen Pereira

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether breaches of duty by Dr Pereira caused or materially contributed to Mr Jones' death
  2. 2 Adequacy of psychiatric handover and care planning
  3. 3 Appropriateness of finding contributory negligence in suicide cases

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the judge's findings on causation were properly founded on the evidence. There was no evidence that the breaches of duty by Dr Pereira caused or materially contributed to Mr Jones' death. The doctrine of material contribution did not apply as the 'but for' test could be determined. The judge's findings regarding handover, care planning, and contributory negligence were not plainly wrong or illogical.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed