Mills & Ors, R. v [2017] EWCA Crim 559 (07 March 2017)

Mills & Ors, R. v [2017] EWCA Crim 559 (07 March 2017)

The sentences for Mills and Lawrence were unduly lenient given their culpability, aggravating factors, and the seriousness of the offences; the sentence for Imray, though lenient, was not unduly so due to his personal vulnerabilities and circumstances.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] EWCA Crim 559
Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Offender: Julie Lillian Mills; Offender: Barry Imray; Offender: Nicole Lawrence
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Sentence Review Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Outcome
Sentences for Mills and Lawrence increased; Imray's sentence left unchanged.
Legal Topics
Causing or Allowing the Death of a Vulnerable Adult, Perverting the Course of Justice, Sentencing, Attorney General's Reference, Unduly Lenient Sentences
Criminal Law Causing or Allowing the Death of a Vulnerable Adult Perverting the Course of Justice Sentencing Attorney General's Reference Unduly Lenient Sentences

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Julie Lillian Mills

Offender

Barry Imray

Offender

Nicole Lawrence

Offender

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Sentence Review Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentences imposed on Mills, Imray, and Lawrence for causing or allowing the death of a vulnerable adult and perverting the course of justice were unduly lenient
  2. 2 Proper approach to sentencing under section 5 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004

Ratio Decidendi

The sentences for Mills and Lawrence were unduly lenient given their culpability, aggravating factors, and the seriousness of the offences; the sentence for Imray, though lenient, was not unduly so due to his personal vulnerabilities and circumstances.

Court Disposition

Sentences for Mills and Lawrence increased; Imray's sentence left unchanged.

Orders

  • Mills: sentence on section 5 offence increased from 7 to 8 years, conspiracy charge increased from 12 months to 2 years consecutive, total 10 years imprisonment.
  • Lawrence: sentence on section 5 offence increased from 4 to 5 years, conspiracy charge to run consecutively at 2 years, total 7 years imprisonment.