CB v Medway Council & Anor (Appeal) [2019] EWCOP 5 (06 March 2019)

CB v Medway Council & Anor (Appeal) [2019] EWCOP 5 (06 March 2019)

The judge erred in summarily dismissing the application without sufficient evidence or proper enquiry into CB's best interests and the feasibility of a return home, particularly given the fundamental rights at stake. Scepticism and doubt are not a lawful basis for curtailing liberty without a full and fair assessment.

Citation
[2019] EWCOP 5
Parties
Appellant: CB; 1st Respondent: Medway Council; 2nd Respondent: CM
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 March 2019
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Appeal / Appeal From Summary Dismissal at First Instance
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Deprivation of Liberty, Best Interests, Summary Judgment, Article 5 ECHR, Article 6 ECHR, Court of Protection Rules

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CB

Appellant

Medway Council

1st Respondent

CM

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Court of Protection Appeal / Appeal From Summary Dismissal at First Instance

  1. 1 Whether the summary dismissal of the application regarding CB's residence and care was lawful and fair
  2. 2 Whether the judge had sufficient evidence to summarily dismiss the application without further enquiry
  3. 3 Whether the process complied with the overriding objective and Articles 5 and 6 ECHR

Ratio Decidendi

The judge erred in summarily dismissing the application without sufficient evidence or proper enquiry into CB's best interests and the feasibility of a return home, particularly given the fundamental rights at stake. Scepticism and doubt are not a lawful basis for curtailing liberty without a full and fair assessment.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The summary dismissal is set aside.
  • The case is remitted for further enquiry and assessment of CB's best interests, with proportionality and avoidance of delay emphasised.