AAA & Anor v CCC [2022] EWHC 2268 (Ch) (01 June 2022)
Given the seriousness and aggravating features of 28 deliberate breaches of a court order, a custodial sentence towards the upper end of the statutory maximum is required. Mitigation for prior good character, health, and limited genuine remorse justifies a reduction, but the sentence must reflect both punishment and deterrence. Part of the sentence may be suspended to incentivize future compliance, but the majority must be served immediately.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 2268 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: AAA; Claimant: BBB; Defendant: CCC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt of Court (committal Proceedings) / Resentencing After Successful Appeal by Claimants; Remitted From Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Defendant sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment for contempt of court; 10 months to be served immediately, 5 months suspended on condition of compliance with the Substantive Order.
- Legal Topics
- Committal for Contempt, Sentencing for Contempt, Suspension of Custodial Sentences, Mitigation and Aggravation in Contempt, Freedom of Expression and Proportionality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AAA
Claimant
BBB
Claimant
CCC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court (committal Proceedings) / Resentencing After Successful Appeal by Claimants; Remitted From Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for 28 breaches of a court order amounting to contempt of court?
- 2 Should the sentence be wholly or partly suspended?
- 3 What weight should be given to mitigation, including remorse, health, and prior good character?
Ratio Decidendi
Given the seriousness and aggravating features of 28 deliberate breaches of a court order, a custodial sentence towards the upper end of the statutory maximum is required. Mitigation for prior good character, health, and limited genuine remorse justifies a reduction, but the sentence must reflect both punishment and deterrence. Part of the sentence may be suspended to incentivize future compliance, but the majority must be served immediately.
Court Disposition
Defendant sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment for contempt of court; 10 months to be served immediately, 5 months suspended on condition of compliance with the Substantive Order.
Orders
- Defendant committed to prison for 15 months for contempt of court.
- 10 months to be served immediately; 5 months suspended subject to compliance with paragraph 3 of the Substantive Order and its confidential schedule.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment