Celtic Contractors Ltd. v Infinite Environmental Services Ltd. & Anor
The letter of 20 August 2002, even if binding, did not create an equitable charge or interest in the Barclays account funds in favour of Celtic. The balance of convenience did not favour granting a freezing injunction, as it would disrupt the construction contract and affect third parties.
- Parties
- Appellant: Celtic Contractors Limited; Respondent: Infinite Environmental Services Limited; Respondent: SAS International Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal of Interim Injunction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunction, Freezing Order, Equitable Charge, Binding Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Celtic Contractors Limited
Appellant
Infinite Environmental Services Limited
Respondent
SAS International Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal of Interim Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the letter of 20 August 2002 constituted a binding agreement between Celtic and IES
- 2 Whether the agreement conferred an equitable interest or charge in favour of Celtic over funds in the Barclays account
- 3 Whether the principles in American Cyanamid v Ethicon Ltd justified the grant of a freezing injunction
Ratio Decidendi
The letter of 20 August 2002, even if binding, did not create an equitable charge or interest in the Barclays account funds in favour of Celtic. The balance of convenience did not favour granting a freezing injunction, as it would disrupt the construction contract and affect third parties.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Appellant to pay respondent's costs summarily assessed at £10,781.45
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment