Mireskandari v Centaur Media Plc [2013] EWHC 3551 (QB) (19 November 2013)

Mireskandari v Centaur Media Plc [2013] EWHC 3551 (QB) (19 November 2013)

The Claimant had no real prospect of defeating the defences of justification and absolute privilege due to the adverse findings of dishonesty and criminal conduct made by the SDT and other courts, and provided no evidence or argument to the contrary. Therefore, the libel claim must be dismissed.

Citation
[2013] EWHC 3551
Parties
Claimant: Shahrokh Mireskandari; Defendant: Centaur Media PLC
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 November 2013
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Application for Strike Out And/or Summary Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed; judgment for Defendant
Legal Topics
Libel, Justification Defence, Absolute Privilege, Strike Out, Summary Judgment, Abuse of Process
Defamation Media Law Civil Procedure Libel Justification Defence Absolute Privilege Strike Out Summary Judgment +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shahrokh Mireskandari

Claimant

Centaur Media PLC

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Libel Action / Application for Strike Out And/or Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the libel claim should be struck out or dismissed by summary judgment due to lack of real prospect of success
  2. 2 Whether the pleaded meanings are capable of being defamatory
  3. 3 Whether the defences of justification and absolute privilege defeat the claim

Ratio Decidendi

The Claimant had no real prospect of defeating the defences of justification and absolute privilege due to the adverse findings of dishonesty and criminal conduct made by the SDT and other courts, and provided no evidence or argument to the contrary. Therefore, the libel claim must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed; judgment for Defendant

Orders

  • Judgment entered against the Claimant on the whole claim
  • Action dismissed