Marathon Oil UK LLC v Centrica Resources Ltd & Ors [2018] EWHC 322 (Comm) (21 February 2018)
Participants are contractually liable to meet a share of a proportion of DRCs in respect of the defined benefit pension scheme for employees engaged in operations, as these costs are part of remuneration authorised by approval of operations. Approval of operations by the Operating Committee constitutes approval of associated employee costs, including pension arrangements. There was no lack of good faith or improper disclosure by the Operator.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 322 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Marathon Oil U.K. LLC; Defendant: Centrica Resources Limited; Defendant: TAQA Bratani Limited; Defendant: TAQA Bratani LNS Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Contractual Dispute / Judgment on Liability
- Outcome
- Participants are liable for a share of DRCs; counterclaim dismissed except for possible adjustment for past overpayments.
- Legal Topics
- Joint Operating Agreements, Defined Benefit Pension Schemes, Deficit Recovery Charges, Fiduciary Duties, Good Faith, Remuneration, Budget Approval, Accounting Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marathon Oil U.K. LLC
Claimant
Centrica Resources Limited
Defendant
TAQA Bratani Limited
Defendant
TAQA Bratani LNS Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Contractual Dispute / Judgment on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Are Participants contractually liable for a share of deficit recovery charges (DRCs) relating to a defined benefit pension scheme for Operator's employees?
- 2 Does the Operator owe fiduciary or contractual duties affecting liability for DRCs?
- 3 Is approval by the Operating Committee required for reimbursement of pension-related costs?
Ratio Decidendi
Participants are contractually liable to meet a share of a proportion of DRCs in respect of the defined benefit pension scheme for employees engaged in operations, as these costs are part of remuneration authorised by approval of operations. Approval of operations by the Operating Committee constitutes approval of associated employee costs, including pension arrangements. There was no lack of good faith or improper disclosure by the Operator.
Court Disposition
Participants are liable for a share of DRCs; counterclaim dismissed except for possible adjustment for past overpayments.
Orders
- Declaration of liability for Participants to meet a share of DRCs in respect of the defined benefit pension scheme.
- Counterclaim dismissed except for quantum adjustment if overpayment established.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment