Marathon Oil UK LLC v Centrica Resources Ltd & Ors
The Participants are contractually liable to meet a share of a proportion of DRCs in respect of the defined benefit pension scheme for employees engaged in operations, as these costs are properly incurred under the Agreements and do not require further specific approval from the Operating Committee. The Operator acted in good faith and within its contractual discretion; no breach of fiduciary or contractual duty was established.
- Parties
- Claimant: Marathon Oil U.K. LLC; Defendant: Centrica Resources Limited; Defendant: TAQA Bratani Limited; Defendant: TAQA Bratani LNS Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contractual Dispute / Judgment on Liability Only
- Outcome
- Participants liable for share of DRCs; counterclaim dismissed (except for possible quantum adjustments for overpayment)
- Legal Topics
- Joint Operating Agreements, Pension Scheme Deficits, Cost Allocation, Fiduciary Duties, Good Faith in Contractual Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marathon Oil U.K. LLC
Claimant
Centrica Resources Limited
Defendant
TAQA Bratani Limited
Defendant
TAQA Bratani LNS Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contractual Dispute / Judgment on Liability Only
Legal Issues
- 1 Are the Participants liable under the Agreements to meet a share of deficit recovery charges (DRCs) in respect of the defined benefit pension scheme for employees engaged in operations?
- 2 Does the Operator require specific further approval from the Operating Committee to recharge pension deficit costs?
- 3 Did the Operator act in good faith or breach any fiduciary or contractual duties in relation to the DRCs?
Ratio Decidendi
The Participants are contractually liable to meet a share of a proportion of DRCs in respect of the defined benefit pension scheme for employees engaged in operations, as these costs are properly incurred under the Agreements and do not require further specific approval from the Operating Committee. The Operator acted in good faith and within its contractual discretion; no breach of fiduciary or contractual duty was established.
Court Disposition
Participants liable for share of DRCs; counterclaim dismissed (except for possible quantum adjustments for overpayment)
Orders
- Declaration that Participants are liable to meet a share of a proportion of DRCs in respect of the Scheme for relevant employees
- Counterclaim dismissed except for quantum adjustments if overpayment established
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment