Century Property (Leeds) Limited v Eville & Jones (Group) Limited & Ors

Century Property (Leeds) Limited v Eville & Jones (Group) Limited & Ors

Century Property was validly assigned the judgment debt and entitled to be substituted as claimant; mandatory injunctions and default provision were just and convenient to enforce the judgment debt against Dr Aldiss' pension fund, given his persistent non-compliance and absence of substantiating evidence for his objections.

Parties
Applicant: Century Property (Leeds) Limited; Claimants: Claimants; First Defendant: Eville & Jones (Group) Limited; Second Defendant: Eville & Jones (GB) Limited; First Defendant: Dr Jason Aldiss; Second Defendant: Vetline Limited; Third Party: Embark Pension Trustees Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 July 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment on Application for Mandatory Injunction and Substitution
Outcome
Application allowed; orders granted as sought in draft.
Legal Topics
Mandatory Injunctions, Substitution of Parties, Enforcement Against Pension Funds, Charging Orders, Default Orders
Civil Procedure Enforcement of Judgments Pensions Law Mandatory Injunctions Substitution of Parties Enforcement Against Pension Funds Charging Orders Default Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Century Property (Leeds) Limited

Applicant

Claimants

Claimants

Eville & Jones (Group) Limited

First Defendant

Eville & Jones (GB) Limited

Second Defendant

Dr Jason Aldiss

First Defendant

Vetline Limited

Second Defendant

Embark Pension Trustees Limited

Third Party

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment on Application for Mandatory Injunction and Substitution

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Century Property should be substituted as claimant
  2. 2 Whether mandatory injunctions should be granted to enforce judgment debt against pension fund
  3. 3 Whether default provision should be included to allow solicitors to execute documents on behalf of debtor

Ratio Decidendi

Century Property was validly assigned the judgment debt and entitled to be substituted as claimant; mandatory injunctions and default provision were just and convenient to enforce the judgment debt against Dr Aldiss' pension fund, given his persistent non-compliance and absence of substantiating evidence for his objections.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; orders granted as sought in draft.

Orders

  • Century Property substituted as claimant.
  • Mandatory injunctions granted against Dr Aldiss and Embark Pension Trustees Limited to enforce judgment debt against pension fund.