CF v R. [2008] EWCA Crim 994 (25 April 2008)
Convictions for anal rape and incitement under s.8(1) are unsafe because it cannot be established that the specific acts occurred after 1 May 2004. Convictions for oral rape are safe as there is unequivocal evidence that such acts occurred after that date.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Crim 994
- Parties
- Appellant: CF; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; convictions on all counts except counts 3 and 4 quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Indictment Defects, Specimen Counts, Retrospective Application of Law
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CF
Appellant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether convictions under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 are safe when the indictment period includes time before the Act came into force
- 2 Whether specific acts constituting the offences can be attributed to the period after 1 May 2004
Ratio Decidendi
Convictions for anal rape and incitement under s.8(1) are unsafe because it cannot be established that the specific acts occurred after 1 May 2004. Convictions for oral rape are safe as there is unequivocal evidence that such acts occurred after that date.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; convictions on all counts except counts 3 and 4 quashed.
Orders
- Convictions on counts 1, 2, 6, and 7 quashed.
- Convictions on counts 3 and 4 (oral rape) upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment