Cowlin Construction Ltd. v CFW Architects (a firm) [2002] EWHC 2914 (TCC) (15 November 2002)
CFW, by serving a Counter Notice and participating in the adjudication, submitted to the adjudicator's jurisdiction and waived the right to object; a construction contract existed between the parties as all essential terms were agreed; a dispute had arisen by the relevant date; and the adjudicator had jurisdiction...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] EWHC 2914 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Cowlin Construction Limited; Defendant: CFW Architects (a firm)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Summary Judgment / Judgment on Application for Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted for the claimant
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Jurisdiction of Adjudicator, Existence of Construction Contract, Waiver of Jurisdictional Objections, VAT in Adjudication Awards
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cowlin Construction Limited
Claimant
CFW Architects (a firm)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Summary Judgment / Judgment on Application for Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator had jurisdiction to decide the dispute between the parties
- 2 Whether there was a construction contract between the parties
- 3 Whether a dispute had arisen capable of being referred to adjudication
Ratio Decidendi
CFW, by serving a Counter Notice and participating in the adjudication, submitted to the adjudicator's jurisdiction and waived the right to object; a construction contract existed between the parties as all essential terms were agreed; a dispute had arisen by the relevant date; and the adjudicator had jurisdiction to award VAT as it was claimed in the notice to adjudicate.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted for the claimant
Orders
- Judgment entered for Cowlin Construction Limited for £323,373.52 (including VAT)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment