CH v CT
The suspended committal order was set aside because there was no proper application for committal, the appellant did not receive adequate notice or opportunity for legal representation, and the child arrangements order lacked a compliant penal notice, rendering it unenforceable by committal.
- Parties
- Applicant: CH; Respondent: CT
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against a Suspended Committal Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; suspended committal order set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Child Arrangements Order, Committal for Contempt, Enforcement of Orders, Legal Aid, Procedural Irregularities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CH
Applicant
CT
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against a Suspended Committal Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suspended committal order was valid given procedural irregularities
- 2 Whether the appellant had proper notice of committal proceedings
- 3 Whether the child arrangements order was capable of enforcement by committal
Ratio Decidendi
The suspended committal order was set aside because there was no proper application for committal, the appellant did not receive adequate notice or opportunity for legal representation, and the child arrangements order lacked a compliant penal notice, rendering it unenforceable by committal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; suspended committal order set aside.
Orders
- Application for enforcement order under s.11J Children Act 1989 to be listed before a circuit judge to determine reasonable excuse for non-compliance.
- Order of 21 July 2017 remains in force.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment