Chambers-Mills v Allied Bakeries
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant persistently failed to comply with tribunal orders to cooperate with a joint medical expert, making a fair hearing impossible. The tribunal was entitled to strike out the claim, and concerns about the unless order and notice were unfounded given the appellant's conduct and the procedural history.
- Parties
- Appellant: Chambers-Mills; Respondent: Allied Bakeries
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (employment) / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Strike Out Applications, Compliance With Tribunal Orders, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chambers-Mills
Appellant
Allied Bakeries
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (employment) / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employment tribunal erred in striking out the appellant's disability discrimination claim for failure to comply with orders and cooperate with a joint medical expert
- 2 Whether the appellant had proper notice and opportunity to respond to the strike out application
- 3 Whether the tribunal failed to consider the removal of an unless order
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant persistently failed to comply with tribunal orders to cooperate with a joint medical expert, making a fair hearing impossible. The tribunal was entitled to strike out the claim, and concerns about the unless order and notice were unfounded given the appellant's conduct and the procedural history.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment