Estates v Freeguard & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 1282 (29 July 2002)
There was no accord and satisfaction because the agreed satisfaction (receipt of payment) was not received by the creditor; therefore, the judgment debt was not discharged and the charging order was properly made.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1282
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: Arun Estates; Applicant/judgment Debtor: Roger Freeguard; Co Owner of House: Mrs Freeguard
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division), Application for Permission to Appeal and to Rely on Further Evidence
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Charging Order, Accord and Satisfaction, Pinnel's Case, Equitable Estoppel, Enforcement of Judgment Debt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Arun Estates
Judgment Creditor
Roger Freeguard
Applicant/judgment Debtor
Mrs Freeguard
Co Owner of House
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division), Application for Permission to Appeal and to Rely on Further Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was accord and satisfaction discharging the judgment debt
- 2 Whether the charging order should have been made
- 3 Whether the judge erred in admitting further evidence or conducting the hearing unfairly
Ratio Decidendi
There was no accord and satisfaction because the agreed satisfaction (receipt of payment) was not received by the creditor; therefore, the judgment debt was not discharged and the charging order was properly made.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment