Hills, R. v
The original sentence was manifestly excessive as the starting point for soliciting to murder was too high given the appellant's withdrawal from the plan and mental health issues; the proper sentence is four and-a-half years concurrent on each count of soliciting to murder and six months consecutive for assault occasioning actual bodily harm, totaling five years' imprisonment, less time served.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Charles Albert Reis Hills
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence reduced
- Legal Topics
- Soliciting to Murder, Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Sentencing, Mitigation, Mental Health in Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Charles Albert Reis Hills
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for soliciting to murder and assault occasioning actual bodily harm was manifestly excessive
- 2 Appropriate starting point for sentencing in cases of soliciting to murder
- 3 Effect of mental health and mitigation on sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence was manifestly excessive as the starting point for soliciting to murder was too high given the appellant's withdrawal from the plan and mental health issues; the proper sentence is four and-a-half years concurrent on each count of soliciting to murder and six months consecutive for assault occasioning actual bodily harm, totaling five years' imprisonment, less time served.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence reduced
Orders
- Concurrent sentences of four and-a-half years on each count of soliciting to murder substituted
- Consecutive sentence of six months for assault occasioning actual bodily harm substituted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment