Greenwold v Pike [2007] EWHC 2202 (Ch) (21 September 2007)
Given the clear difference of opinion between qualified counsel and the existence of minors among the beneficiaries, it is inappropriate to resolve the construction issue or admit evidence of intention without a full hearing. The matter should proceed to trial for final determination.
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 2202 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Natalie Karen Helen Greenwold; Defendant: Charles Lander Pike
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S.48 Administration Justice Act 1985 / Interlocutory Application for Directions
- Outcome
- Leave granted to amend the Claim Form for trial.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Trust Instruments, Rectification, Interpretation of 'spouse' in Settlements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Natalie Karen Helen Greenwold
Claimant
Charles Lander Pike
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application Under S.48 Administration Justice Act 1985 / Interlocutory Application for Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'spouse' in clause 1(8)(b) of the Settlement includes 'widow'
- 2 Whether clause 7.1 of the Settlement is meaningless and of no effect
- 3 Whether evidence of settlor's intention is admissible for construction or only for rectification
Ratio Decidendi
Given the clear difference of opinion between qualified counsel and the existence of minors among the beneficiaries, it is inappropriate to resolve the construction issue or admit evidence of intention without a full hearing. The matter should proceed to trial for final determination.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to amend the Claim Form for trial.
Orders
- Claimants granted leave to amend the Claim Form to enable the matter to be determined at trial.
- Consideration to be given to joining Mrs Greenwold and a representative for the other beneficiaries.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment