Regina v Onwu
The appeal was dismissed because it was filed out of time with no request for extension, and even if filed in time, the case did not meet the threshold for exceptional complexity or dispatch to warrant enhanced rates, nor was the reduction in allowed document review hours unreasonable.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Defendant: Charles Onwu
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Under Regulation 29 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Proceedings, Legal Aid Remuneration, Enhanced Rates, Document Review, Timeliness of Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Charles Onwu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Under Regulation 29 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal was filed within the statutory time limit
- 2 Whether enhanced rates should be allowed for work done in confiscation proceedings
- 3 Whether the time allowed for review of documentary evidence was reasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because it was filed out of time with no request for extension, and even if filed in time, the case did not meet the threshold for exceptional complexity or dispatch to warrant enhanced rates, nor was the reduction in allowed document review hours unreasonable.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment