Smith, R v [2002] EWCA Crim 840 (19 March 2002)
The conviction for murder must be quashed and substituted with manslaughter on grounds of diminished responsibility, as medical evidence now demonstrates the appellant suffered from psychopathic disorder substantially impairing his responsibility at the time of the offence.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Crim 840
- Parties
- Appellant: Charlie Smith; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal After Referral by Criminal Cases Review Commission
- Outcome
- murder conviction quashed; manslaughter conviction substituted
- Legal Topics
- Diminished Responsibility, Manslaughter, Murder, Mental Health Act, Homicide Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charlie Smith
Appellant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal After Referral by Criminal Cases Review Commission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's conviction for murder should be substituted with manslaughter on grounds of diminished responsibility
- 2 Whether sufficient medical evidence exists to support diminished responsibility at the time of the first killing
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction for murder must be quashed and substituted with manslaughter on grounds of diminished responsibility, as medical evidence now demonstrates the appellant suffered from psychopathic disorder substantially impairing his responsibility at the time of the offence.
Court Disposition
murder conviction quashed; manslaughter conviction substituted
Orders
- Order under section 37 of the Mental Health Act 1983 for hospital treatment
- Order under section 41 of the Mental Health Act 1983 for restriction without limit of time
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment